Ecstasy History
MDMA was patented as long ago as 1913 by the German company Merck. Rumor has
it that the drug was sold as a slimming pill along with comic descriptions of
its strange side effects, although it was never marketed and the patent doesn't
mention uses. The next time it came to light was in 1953 when the US army tested
a number of drugs for military applications - again, folklore says it was tried
as a truth drug but there is no evidence for this.(1)
The father of MDMA - or 'stepfather' as he describes himself - is Alexander
Shulgin.(2) After obtaining a PhD in biochemistry from the University of California
at Berkeley, Shulgin got a job as a research chemist with Dow Chemicals, for
whom he invented a profitable insecticide. As a reward, the company gave him
a free hand and his own lab. Having had an exciting experience on Mescaline,
Shulgin used the opportunity to research psychedelic drugs. An accepted test
for psychedelic effects was to observe how fighting fish change their behavior.
But there were problems: fish don't say when they are under the influence and,
well, have you ever seen a fish that doesn't look stoned? His answer was to
'suck it and see'.
Eventually his company was embarrassed to find themselves holding the patents
of some popular street drugs and he was politely given the push. Shulgin continued
testing new compounds on himself and a select group of friends for many years.
Thanks to his remarkable personality - combining openness without proselytising
about his liberal and controversial views - he has earned the respect of influential
people and is able to carry on with his research today, with the full approval
of the US government. His approach to psychedelics is similar to that of a botanist:
he specializes in the phenethylamines, and delights in recording the subtle
differences between each member of that family of drugs. His experiences are
described in his autobiography Phenethylamines I Have Known And Loved. MDMA
is but one of 179 psychoactive drugs which he describes in detail, and, although
its effects are less dramatic than many, MDMA is perhaps the one which comes
closest to fulfilling his ambition of finding a therapeutic drug. Shulgin has
now moved on to writing a book about another family of psychoactive drugs, the
tryptamines, due out in 1995.
However, it was only after hearing glowing reports from other experimenters
who had also synthesized and tried MDMA that Shulgin took an interest. He describes
how in 1977 he gave some to an old friend who was about to retire from his career
of psychotherapy.
He phoned me a few days later to tell me he had abandoned his plans for a quiet
retirement. I know none of the details of the increasingly complex network which
he proceeded to develop over the following decade, but I do know that he traveled
across the country introducing MDMA to other therapists and teaching then how
to use it in their therapy. They had all began, of course, by taking the drug
themselves. He believed (as I do) that no therapist has the right to give a
psychoactive drug to another person unless and until he is thoroughly familiar
with its effects on his own mind. Many of the psychologists and psychiatrists
whom Leo instructed developed small groups or enclaves of professionals who
had been similarly taught, and the information and techniques he had introduced
spread widely and, in time, internationally.
It is impossible to ever know the true breadth of therapeutic MDMA usage achieved
during the remaining years of his life, but at his memorial service, I asked
an old friend of his whether she had a guess at the number of people he had
introduced to this incredible tool, either directly or indirectly. She was silent
for a moment, then said, 'Well, I've thought about that, and I think probably
around four thousand, give or take a few.' Those first psychotherapists to use
MDMA were keenly aware that they had found a valuable new tool.(3, 4, 135) As
one put it, "MDMA is penicillin for the soul, and you don't give up prescribing
penicillin, once you've seen what it can do". They were equally aware that
if MDMA became a popular street drug, it could follow in the footsteps of LSD
and be criminalized by the US government. They agreed to do as much informal
research as possible without bringing the drug to public attention, and did
pretty well - MDMA only gradually became known as a fun drug and it wasn't until
1984 that the bubble burst.
If MDMA is so wonderful, why hasn't it been marketed by any of the big drug
companies? One reason is that the drug's commercial potential is small; another
was that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prohibited trials on humans.
But perhaps the most significant obstacle to the commercial exploitation of
MDMA is that it has already been patented - although the patent ran out years
ago, a drug cannot be patented a second time. Before marketing a new drug, a
drug company has to show that the safety risks are justified by the drug's benefits
as a medicine, and this involves long and expensive trials. The only way of
recouping that expense is by obtaining exclusive rights to sell the drug through
holding its patent.
Those years 1977 to 1985 are looked back on as the 'golden age' of Ecstasy
or Adam(5) as it was then known. In psychotherapy, its use only appealed to
a few experimental therapists since it didn't fit in with the usual 50-minute
psychotherapy session, but they did include some of the most dynamic people
in the field, including some who claimed that a five hour Adam session was as
good as 5 months of therapy.(166) There was also a select a group of 'explorers'
who used the drug in various ways, but, surprisingly, they never discovered
its potential as a dance drug.
By 1984 the drug was still legal and was being used widely among students in
the USA under its new name 'Ecstasy'. (Rumor has it that a big-time dealer called
it 'Empathy', but, although the name is more appropriate, he found that Ecstasy
had more sales appeal.) In Dallas and Fort Worth, Texas, Ecstasy was even on
sale in bars where you could pay by credit card, where it replaced cocaine as
the drug of choice among yuppies and even spread to people who normally kept
well clear of drugs. However, it was this public and unashamed use that resulted
in the drug being outlawed.
A deeply-embedded puritan ethic seems to affect the response to drugs in Western
societies. To use a drug for pleasure is taboo(3), yet to use a drug to relieve
pain is acceptable. In reality there is no sharp distinction: if someone is
'suffering from depression' and a drug makes him feel happy, it is regarded
as a medicine and meets with approval. But if that person is regarded as normal
and takes a drug that makes him happy, he is indulging in something quite unacceptable.
Except, of course, if the drug happens to be nicotine or alcohol.(16)
During 1985 Ecstasy got into the mass media because a small group of people
sued the US Drug Enforcement Agency to try to prevent them from outlawing the
drug. The controversy provided free advertising which made Ecstasy spread like
wildfire throughout the US. It was a case of bad timing - the previous year
there had been a widely publicized disaster that made the authorities overreact
to any new scare. A batch of 'China White', a so-called designer drug(6) which
was sold to heroin addicts as a legal substitute, had contained a poisonous
impurity, and, tragically, it caused a form of severe brain damage similar to
Parkinson's disease.(7) As a result the US Congress passed a new law allowing
the DEA to put an emergency ban on any drug it thought might be a danger to
the public. On July 1st 1985 this right was used for the first time to ban MDMA
- what is more, MDMA was put in the most restrictive category of all, reserved
for damaging and addictive drugs without medical use.(8) The effect of prohibition
was to curtail research into the drug without changing the attitudes of recreational
users.(9) However, the Agency's haste was at the expense of not following the
letter of the law, leaving the ruling to be overturned in subsequent court cases.
The temporary ban only lasted for a year; meanwhile a hearing was set up to
decide what permanent measures should be taken against the drug. The case received
much publicity and was accompanied by press reports advancing the kind of scare
stories now current in Europe, which added to the pressure to make the ban permanent.
One widely publicized report referred to evidence that another drug, MDA, caused
brain damage in rats and concluded that MDMA could cause brain damage in humans.(10,
11, 12) The media indulged in horror scenarios of 'our kids' brains rotting
by the time they were thirty, although there was no evidence that MDMA caused
brain damage in rats at the dosage levels used by humans. On the other side
were the psychotherapists who gave evidence of the benefits of the drug - but
they had failed to prepare their ground by carrying out scientifically acceptable
trials, so their evidence was regarded as 'anecdotal'.
The case ended with the judge recommending that MDMA be placed in a less restrictive
category, Schedule 3, which would have allowed it to be manufactured, to be
used on prescription and to be the subject of research. But the recommendation
was ignored by the DEA, which refused to back down and instead placed MDMA permanently
in Schedule 1. A group of MDMA supporters made a successful challenge to this
decision in the Federal Court of Appeal, but their objections were overturned
on 23rd March 1988. The fight is still continuing on the grounds that the law
is unconstitutional, that the correct procedure was not followed and that the
DEA did not take all the evidence into account.
In most countries including the US, all new drugs are regarded as 'innocent
until proved guilty' unless they are substantially similar in structure and
effect to prohibited drugs, and this gives rise to the phenomenon known as 'designer
drugs' - drugs which have been deliberately synthesized to avoid the law. In
Britain, however, whole families of chemicals - including members that have
not been invented - are treated as 'guilty until proved innocent' under the
law. Psychedelic amphetamines, which includes MDA, MDEA and MDMA have been illegal
in Britain since 1977, and, as in the US, MDMA has been placed in the category
that attracts highest penalties.(13, 14) All member countries of the United
Nations are signatories to the International Convention on Psychotropic Substances
(ICPO) and follow recommendations laid down by the World Health Organization
Expert Committee on Drug Dependence. In 1985, under American pressure, the ICPO
asked member nations to place the drug in Schedule 1 although the chairman of
the WHO Expert Committee disagreed with this decision, stating that "At
this time, international control is not warranted." A clause was added
encouraging member nations to "facilitate research on this interesting
substance".(15)
The criminalization of MDMA in America has had wide-ranging consequences. The
first was to prevent the drug being used by professional therapists, except
in Switzerland (see chapter 9). The second w as to reduce the quality of the
drug as sold on the street, because demand was now met by clandestine laboratories
and the drug was distributed through the criminal network. Although the number
of users was dramatically reduced at first, criminalization did not prevent
the drug's popularity spreading worldwide.
Ecstasy arrives in Europe
Ecstasy was favored by Bhagwan Rajneesh, the Indian guru whose disciples wore
orange, and when his followers moved out of their ashram in Oregon they brought
the drug to Europe in the mid eighties.(17)
The rave scene started on the hippy holiday island of Ibiza in 1987, where
Ecstasy joined LSD and hashish at all-night dance parties. In England 'raves'
took the form of both large outdoor and warehouse parties, well described by
Paul Staines in Appendix 3.
Warehouses were prepared secretly so as to avoid local people obtaining a court
order to prevent the raves happening. Tickets were sold in advance without the
address, but with a phone number to ring on the night for instructions regarding
a meeting place such as a motorway service station from where a convoy would
proceed to the venue. Opposition to raves was fierce since people living up
to two miles away could be kept awake all night. By 1990 the British government
had passed a law, the Entertainments (Increased Penalties Act)(18), which effectively
put an end to these big gatherings.
The result was to push ravers into dance clubs. The Hacienda in Manchester
led the trend in 1988 with the now prevalent style: DJs who never spoke, but
teased the dancers with their subtle 'scratching' establishing the Manchester
sound.(19) From there clubbing on E came to London, the rest of Europe and eventually
back to E's native California, as reported in the San Francisco Examiner:
The English ravers hit San Francisco in the winter of 1991. "We were suddenly
surrounded by these kids, moving here from England. They were coming here in
droves and bringing with them a new sensibility, a new style of clothes."
By this time Ecstasy had reached nearly every corner of society in England
and by the winter of 1991-2 demand had outstripped supply, partly due to some
massive police seizures.(20, 21) Dealers responded by selling any old tablet
as Ecstasy and no doubt made huge profits, but as a result people had disappointing
experiences and turned away from Ecstasy. Many turned to LSD instead for the
simple reason that the dose cannot be adulterated(13) as it is microscopic (a
thousand times smaller than a dose of MDMA) and is normally sold absorbed into
a 'blotter', a tiny piece of paper too small to absorb active quantities of
any other popular drug.
The English pattern of use contrasts with the American one both in kind and
volume, which accounts for there being so many more casualties here. The proportion
of young people taking Ecstasy is many times higher in Britain(22, 23), and
here it is nearly always used as a dance drug. Americans generally use Ecstasy
at home, although English-style raves are on the increase.
Although the therapeutic use of MDMA has been outlawed in the US for the past
seven years, steps are being taken there towards MDMA becoming a prescription
drug. To comply with prerequisites for the licensing of new drugs, a non-profit
organization called The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies
(MAPS) opened a Drug Master File for MDMA in 1986, thus permitting research
into the drug to be conducted. Recently, research into the effects of MDMA in
human volunteers has been approved by the FDA itself, and trials began in 1993.(24)
I have faith in common sense prevailing over prejudice in the long run; unless
new evidence emerges that MDMA is toxic or another drug appears that is even
better, I believe that one day MDMA will be an acceptable medicine.