 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major Cities in Massachusetts with Drug Rehab and Treatment Centers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
866-407-4380
|
Drug Rehab Massachusetts
is here to help people with drug and/or alcohol abuse problems in Massachusetts. find treatment options. Due to our diverse networking system we can find a treatment option tailored to each individuals specific situation and needs. We are able to provide all phases of recovery included but not limited to, alcohol and/or drug intervention, drug and/or alcohol detox, in-patient treatment, out-patient treatment, short term treatment (30 days or less), long term treatment (90 days or longer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We design personalized treatment programs to provide each abuser with the greatest chance of a successful recovery outcome. Our comprehensive networking system works hand in hand with all of the drug treatment centers in Massachusetts. At Drug Rehab Massachusetts we know that each individual is unique and are treated as such. Deciding upon a treatment option in Massachusetts, or anywhere can be a daunting task for any individual or family, we will guide you through each step of a comprehensive treatment plan for you or your loved one. We are determined in our mission, that every drug and/or alcohol abuser in Massachusetts. that has a desire to change their life will be given a chance to recover from their addiction and we are dedicated to ensuring that they are given the opportunity to do so.
|
|
We realize that each individual in Massachusetts. is in a different financial situation and we will find treatment options for each individual regardless of their financial situation. No matter what your financial situation everyone will receive the treatment help they are looking for.
|
|
|
|
866-407-4380
|
|
Crack down on drunken drivers, even young ones in MassachusettsYou wouldn't want to be Michelle Sullivan right now. The 19-year-old Ipswich, Massachusetts woman faces many years in prison for allegedly killing her friend in a drunken driving accident. The severity of her sentence will determine whether we can trust the criminal justice system in Massachusetts.
We have seen these stories dozens of times before and commented on many of them. The newspaper is filled with tales of drunken drivers getting light sentences, almost as an invitation to keep drinking and driving until someone gets killed. Even then, a defendant might luck out, get a judge who doesn't care about the public, and get off with probation. It happens all the time.
So what about Sullivan? Was it a freak accident on Nov. 5 when she lost control of her car and smashed into a telephone pole, killing 17-year-old Lisa Speraco in the back seat? Police don't think so. They say Sullivan had been drinking beer at a party and was speeding and talking on her cell phone at the time of the crash.
Sullivan appeared headed for trouble anyway. She was supposed to give up her license Nov. 7 for seven months after another arrest, on Oct. 24, for drunken driving. This is clearly a young woman who didn't learn her lesson.
Sullivan's lawyer had a ready excuse. He said Sullivan had "learning disabilities" and the maturity of a 16-year-old. But we think even a 16-year-old — with learning disabilities — knows you don't drink and drive; or go nearly twice the speed limit, gabbing on a cell phone. Such behavior is beyond irresponsible — it is criminal.
Sullivan, if found guilty, must be held responsible. Her alleged behavior beyond a single tragic day reveals a pattern. That is a pattern best broken by time in prison, not by a slap on the wrist. At some point, society has to say "enough is enough" and we have to stop coddling our children.
By 19 — or 16 — a person knows right from wrong. She knows that if you get drunk at a party and zip off in a car, there is a chance bad things can happen. We only compound the tragedy by being lenient and sending a message that the life of a teenager — sitting innocently in the back seat — is not worth all that much.
Correction: An editorial Tuesday about the recount in the Ward 3 and Ward 7 Brockton City Council elections Nov. 4 incorrectly stated that absentee ballots cast in Ward 7 broke heavily in favor of one candidate. In fact, the number of votes, if any, that each candidate received on absentee ballots will not be known until the recount Thursday.
Drug Rehab by County
|
|
More...